Cost-Saving Opportunities in Microsoft EA Renewal
Microsoft Enterprise Agreement (EA) renewals in 2025 present a critical opportunity to reduce long-term costs. EA renewals often come with rising prices and new upsells, and Microsoft’s default renewal offers are rarely optimized for the customer’s needs.
In fact, recent pricing changes (such as the elimination of volume-based discounts for online services) mean large enterprises could end up paying list prices unless they proactively negotiate. Read our Microsoft EA renewal checklist.
The good news is that with early preparation and a solid strategy, organizations can avoid unnecessary spending and significantly reduce their Microsoft EA renewal costs. Companies that thoroughly assess their usage and plan ahead have achieved 20–30% savings at renewal time.
The key is to treat an EA renewal not as a routine renewal, but as a chance to realign your contract with actual business needs and cut out waste.
Where Overspend Happens
Understanding where EA overspending occurs is the first step. Common pitfalls include:
- Shelfware (unused licenses): Enterprises often pay for far more licenses than they actually use. It’s not unusual to find double-digit percentages of EA seats sitting idle as “shelfware,” representing pure waste. For example, many organizations discover numerous Office 365 accounts assigned to former employees or to users who never log in. These unused licenses add no value but continue to incur costs.
- Overcommitting to E5 or premium bundles: Microsoft 365 E5 and similar premium bundles include advanced security, compliance, and voice features—but they cost substantially more per user (E5 can be ~60% more expensive than E3). Paying for the top-tier bundle for every employee, regardless of their job role, leads to overspend on features that many users don’t need or use. This “one-size-fits-all” licensing approach leaves money on the table.
- Excessive Azure commitments: Microsoft often encourages upfront Azure consumption commitments in your EA. If you lock in a large Azure spend but your cloud adoption lags, you end up paying for cloud capacity you never utilize. Overcommitting to Azure can leave 10–20% of your cloud budget unused. In essence, it’s prepaid spend that gets wasted if actual usage falls short. This is a common overspend area, especially if enterprises feel pressured to “go big” on Azure to secure a discount.
- Compliance blind spots (contractors/external users): Another costly mistake is failing to properly license contractors, partners, or external users who access your systems. If external users aren’t covered via the right licenses or an External Connector, it creates a compliance gap. In an audit, Microsoft can demand back payments and penalties for unlicensed use. In other words, not accounting for these users upfront can lead to unexpected true-up costs or fines later. Ensuring all users (internal or external) are correctly licensed will prevent expensive surprises.
Each of these scenarios contributes to overspending. The EA’s complexity and Microsoft’s sales tactics (like bundling extra products into your agreement) make it easy for costs to creep up over a 3-year term. However, each overspend area is also an opportunity to save during renewal by identifying and eliminating these inefficiencies.
Read what to do, Preparing for Microsoft EA Renewal.
Top Cost-Saving Levers
When approaching an EA renewal with cost reduction in mind, focus on a few high-impact levers that can significantly lower your spend:
- Optimize your user mix: Tailor the licenses to the actual needs of different user groups instead of assigning the same high-cost license to everyone. Many organizations have a mix of power users and basic users. For example, executives or IT admins might need the full Microsoft 365 E5 suite, but most employees could be fine with E3, and frontline or part-time workers might only require an F3 or E1 license. By segmenting users based on roles and usage patterns, you avoid overpaying for unnecessary features. In practice, this might mean renewing with, say, 1,000 E5 licenses for specific roles and 5,000 E3/F3 licenses for the rest, rather than 6,000 E5 licenses across the board. Optimizing the user/license mix ensures you’re paying for premium capabilities only where they truly make a difference.
- Align volume commitments with actual usage: Take a hard look at the quantities and products in your EA and adjust them to reality. Don’t simply renew the same numbers “just in case.” If you had 10% more licenses than employees last term, reduce the baseline now to eliminate that pad. Likewise, review your Azure and Dynamics usage: if your EA included a large Azure monetary commitment that you underused, negotiate a smaller, more realistic commitment this time. Conversely, if you consistently exceeded a commitment and paid overage, use that data to negotiate a better rate on a higher commitment. The goal is to right-size all commitments so you’re not buying capacity or licenses that are likely to sit unused.
- Negotiate Software Assurance value: Software Assurance (SA) is a significant component of EA costs (it’s essentially an “insurance” fee for upgrades and support). Don’t pay for SA without maximizing its benefits. As you renew, push for more value from SA-related entitlements – or even additional perks – to offset its cost. This could include securing training vouchers, planning/deployment days, or support credits at no extra charge as part of your SA. Ensure you will actually use the benefits (e.g., training days, FastTrack deployment assistance, or home use rights). If certain SA benefits (like upgrade rights) are less relevant because you’re already on subscription licenses, consider whether you need those components at all. The key is to either get tangible value for the SA fees you pay or negotiate them down.
- Avoid inflated Azure forecasts: Microsoft may try to lock you into a hefty Azure spending plan for the next three years, often in exchange for a nominal discount. Treat those cloud spend commitments with caution. It’s better to commit to a conservative Azure amount that matches your proven usage or near-term roadmap than to overcommit based on Microsoft’s rosy adoption forecasts. Tying cloud spend to real business needs means that if your cloud journey slows or changes, you’re not stuck overspending. Also, remember you have alternatives: if Microsoft insists on an unrealistic Azure commitment, you can keep some workloads off-EA (e.g., in a pay-as-you-go or CSP model) until you’re confident in the usage. In short, commit small and grow if needed, rather than overcommitting and wasting budget.
- Leverage competitive alternatives: Microsoft isn’t your only option for licensing and services, and you can use that fact to your advantage. Two avenues stand out: alternative licensing channels and alternative platforms. First, compare your EA renewal quotes with Cloud Solution Provider (CSP) or Microsoft Customer Agreement (MCA-E) offerings. With the recent flattening of volume pricing, a CSP reseller might offer a discount (even 5–10% off Microsoft’s list rates) to win your business. If those quotes come in lower, Microsoft will often match or beat them to keep you under the EA. Second, consider competitive platforms (like Google Workspace or AWS for certain workloads) and let Microsoft know you’re evaluating them. Even if you don’t plan to switch, having a credible alternative puts pressure on Microsoft’s sales team to sharpen their pencil on pricing. This leverage can translate into better discounts or more flexible terms. Microsoft is aware that customers now have more choices, especially for cloud services, so demonstrating that you’re willing to explore those choices can significantly improve your deal.
Keep an eye on the Microsoft EA Renewal Timeline and Planning.
How to Model Savings Scenarios
Before you sit down at the negotiation table, it’s wise to model out different renewal scenarios to see where the best savings lie. This financial modeling helps quantify the impact of various decisions.
Here’s how to approach it:
- Compare EA vs. CSP vs. hybrid models: Model the total 3-year cost if you stay 100% on the EA versus if you transition some or all services to a monthly subscription model like CSP or an MCA-E. For instance, calculate your Microsoft 365 and Azure costs at EA pricing and then at CSP pricing for the same quantities. A hybrid approach is common: maybe keep core services in the EA for stability and negotiated discounts, but move flexible or smaller workloads to CSP for agility. With Microsoft moving to “Level A” pricing for all (list price), you might find a CSP partner can offer better rates on certain items. By comparing these scenarios, you can identify a mix that minimizes cost while meeting your needs. In some cases, switching a portion of licenses to CSP or MCA-E can reduce costs and provide month-to-month flexibility. Still, you need to ensure any CSP savings aren’t offset by loss of EA-wide discounts on remaining licenses.
- Forecast true-ups (and true-downs) over three years: Don’t assume your Year 1 EA cost will remain static. If your organization is growing, factor in the cost of adding users or products during the term (the true-up process). Conversely, if you anticipate downsizing or efficiency gains, consider the benefit of reducing licenses mid-term. Standard EAs don’t allow reducing license counts until renewal, but you might negotiate some flexibility or plan to shift surplus users to CSP if needed. Model a realistic growth rate in headcount or usage for each year and see how that impacts the total cost. This forecasting will help you negotiate caps or fixed pricing for true-ups so you avoid budget surprises later. In essence, plan for the most likely scenario, not just the best-case scenario.
- Include license optimization in the projections: If you plan to implement optimization strategies (like reclaiming 15% of unused licenses, or downgrading a chunk of E5 users to E3), build those into your cost model. For example, what does the 3-year cost look like if you drop 1,000 E5 licenses to E3 next cycle? Or if you eliminate a redundant software bundle in year 2? Calculate the savings these changes yield over the term. This not only quantifies the value of your cost-saving ideas but also prepares you to demonstrate the rationale behind your requests to stakeholders (and Microsoft). Having a data-driven story – “We identified $X in savings by right-sizing licenses” – strengthens your negotiating position.
By modeling these scenarios, you’ll arrive at a clear picture of where the biggest cost-saving opportunities are and what trade-offs are involved. It enables you to enter negotiations with a target outcome and evidence to support it.
Moreover, it helps you decide if alternatives like moving to CSP or a Microsoft Customer Agreement make financial sense or if staying on the EA with a strong discount is better. Ultimately, thorough scenario modeling ensures that you make an informed decision, balancing cost, flexibility, and risk.
Checklist of Cost-Saving Opportunities
To ensure you cover all bases, use the following checklist of key actions when preparing for an EA renewal. These steps each target a specific area of potential savings:
| Action | Opportunity Uncovered | Savings Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Audit current usage | Identify shelfware (unused licenses) | Direct savings by removing licenses you don’t use (stop paying for waste). |
| User segmentation | Avoid blanket E5 assignments – match license level to user role | Prevents overpaying for high-tier features that most users don’t need, reducing per-user costs. |
| CSP/MCA-E comparison | Leverage competitive pricing from CSP resellers or Microsoft’s MCA-E | Creates negotiation advantage – use better offers as leverage to secure deeper EA discounts or switch to lower-cost channels. |
| Optimize true-up terms | Negotiate flexibility for adding or removing licenses (true-ups/downs) | Avoids surprise costs during the term and provides budget stability. If needs drop, you’re not stuck overpaying. |
| Maximize SA value | Demand value-added benefits for Software Assurance (support, training, deployment help) | Reduces waste – ensures you get tangible returns (services or savings) for the SA fees you pay, or allows cutting unnecessary SA spend. |
Use this checklist as a guide while planning your renewal strategy. Each action helps uncover inefficiencies or strengthen your position, directly translating to cost savings or cost avoidance.
For example, auditing usage and segmenting licenses prevents renewing more licenses or more expensive licenses than needed, while comparing EA vs CSP offers ensures you’re not leaving a better deal on the table.
Optimizing true-up terms and Software Assurance value protects you from hidden costs that often inflate budgets mid-term. By systematically ticking off these items, you set the stage for a much leaner and more flexible EA renewal.
Five Strategies to Reduce EA Renewal Costs
Finally, let’s distill the approach into five overarching strategies.
These are practical tactics to ensure you secure the best possible deal and avoid overspending:
- Start early and build leverage with facts. Don’t wait until the last month to address your EA renewal. Begin the process 6–12 months in advance, allowing time to gather data and build your case. Early preparation means you can audit your current usage, understand what you truly need, and approach Microsoft with a clear picture. It also gives you the freedom to time your negotiations to Microsoft’s fiscal calendar. Microsoft sales teams are under pressure to close deals by the end of the quarter and especially by the end of the fiscal year (June). By engaging early, you can aim to finalize the renewal at a time when Microsoft is most eager to meet targets – which often translates into better discounts or concessions for you. Moreover, starting early keeps you in control: you’re not forced to accept a subpar last-minute deal due to time constraints. In short, proactive planning = more negotiating power.
- Challenge every upsell (especially E5 and Copilot). Microsoft will likely push new products and upgrades during the renewal period. Commonly, they try to convince customers to upgrade all users to E5 or to add hot new offerings like Microsoft 365 Copilot (the AI-powered assistant) for everyone. Be skeptical of these across-the-board upsells. Ask tough questions: Do we have evidence that this expensive add-on is needed enterprise-wide? Can we pilot it with a small group instead? For example, Copilot costs roughly $30 per user per month. Rolling it out to thousands of users without a proven ROI could be a huge waste if adoption is low. It’s perfectly reasonable to tell Microsoft “no, not right now” on broad upsells. Instead, if there’s interest, propose a limited trial or subset deployment and make any larger rollout contingent on success metrics. By challenging upsells, you avoid falling for the “latest shiny object” that inflates your costs, and you keep your EA focused on what your organization truly needs on day one.
- Use competition as a bargaining chip. Remember that you have options – and Microsoft knows it. Use that to your advantage during negotiation. This means getting quotes for equivalent services or licenses from other sources. For instance, obtain pricing from a CSP partner for your Microsoft 365 subscriptions, or evaluate an alternative like Google Workspace for productivity or AWS for certain cloud workloads. You don’t necessarily have to switch providers, but having a competitive bid or the plausible plan to do so gives you leverage. You can go to Microsoft and say, “We have a better offer for these services elsewhere.” Microsoft would prefer to keep your business in an EA or on Azure rather than see you migrate. As a result, they may respond with improved pricing, extra discounts, or more favorable terms to match the competition. In essence, create a scenario where Microsoft has to compete for your renewal, rather than treating it as a given. Even leveraging Microsoft’s own programs against each other (EA vs CSP vs MCA-E) can yield concessions. The more alternatives you have in play, the stronger your negotiating hand.
- Tie commitments to real business needs, not Microsoft’s roadmap. Microsoft’s sales pitch often aligns with their product roadmap and strategic goals – for example, they might encourage a big commitment to Azure or adoption of a new Dynamics module because it fits their growth plans. It’s crucial to differentiate between your actual business requirements and Microsoft’s selling agenda. Only commit to licenses and cloud spend that you can map to concrete, near-term needs or proven value. If Microsoft presents a must-buy-now narrative (“Everyone is moving to this new platform” or “This discount only if you take XYZ product”), take a step back. Does that product support a strategic initiative you have today? If not, it can likely wait. By keeping commitments aligned to your roadmap, you avoid being oversold on futures that may never materialize on your side. This also gives you leverage: you can say, “We’ll consider that new product when it fits our plan – for now, we need a deal that suits our current priorities.” Microsoft may offer flexibility, such as shorter-term trials, or agree to exclude certain bundles, rather than lose the core deal. The bottom line: your spend should follow your own business value, not just Microsoft’s product hype.
- Secure flexibility for workforce and business changes. Over a 3-year term, a lot can change – mergers, divestitures, economic shifts, new initiatives, or layoffs. A smart EA renewal strategy anticipates change and bakes in as much flexibility as you can get. Negotiate terms that let you adjust if things change. For example, try to include a clause allowing a partial true-down (license reduction) at the anniversary if your user count drops, or at least the ability to swap equivalent licenses (e.g., trade some Office 365 seats for Dynamics 365 seats) if business needs shift. Microsoft might not readily grant these, but large or strategic customers have managed to secure rights to reduce license counts by a certain percentage (say 5–10%) each year without penalty. Another route is negotiating an Enterprise Subscription Agreement (EAS) or adding CSP components for portions of your users – this way some licenses can lapse or scale down if not needed, rather than being locked in for the full term. Also, consider timing: a shorter term or an early opt-out for specific services can protect you if a project is canceled. The goal is to avoid being stuck paying for licenses or cloud services that you no longer need. By building flexibility into the contract, you mitigate risk and ensure you’re not overpaying due to circumstances outside your control. It might come at the cost of a slightly smaller discount upfront, but it can save you a lot more if your situation changes. Always remember: a bit of flexibility can be worth a lot of money saved in the long run.
By applying these five strategies, you put yourself in a much stronger position to reduce EA renewal costs while still getting the technology your organization needs. It’s about being proactive, questioning assumptions, and negotiating a deal that serves your interests over the next few years.
FAQs
Q: What’s the easiest way to reduce Microsoft EA renewal costs?
A: Start by eliminating obvious waste. Do a thorough license audit to identify shelfware and remove or downgrade those unused licenses. This, along with proper user segmentation, immediately eliminates unnecessary spending.
Q: Is Microsoft 365 E5 worth it for everyone in our company?
A: No. E5 is only cost-justified for users who truly need its advanced features (like advanced security, compliance, or voice capabilities). Most employees can thrive with E3 or lower. Only upgrade the roles that will use E5’s extras; that restraint can save a lot.
Q: Do we have to accept Microsoft’s suggested Azure commitment in an EA renewal?
A: Not at all. You should negotiate an Azure commitment that fits your actual cloud adoption plans. If Microsoft’s ask is larger than your forecasted use, push back. It’s better to commit to a smaller, realistic amount (and add later if needed) than to overcommit and pay for unused cloud services.
Q: Can we switch from an EA to CSP or MCA-E for cost savings?
A: Yes, many organizations are exploring this. Moving to the Cloud Solution Provider model or Microsoft Customer Agreement can sometimes reduce costs and provide month-to-month flexibility. However, model it out carefully: you may lose some EA discounts on certain products, so compare the total cost. Some choose a hybrid approach – keeping core licenses in the EA for discounts and using CSP for variable needs – to get the best of both worlds.
Q: How can we avoid surprise expenses during the EA term after renewal?
A: Negotiate the terms of true-ups and changes upfront. Ensure you have price protections (so adding users doesn’t cost more each year) and try to get the ability to adjust down if possible. Also, forecast your growth conservatively – if you expect to add 100 users next year, budget for those licenses now. By locking in predictable terms and accounting for likely growth, you won’t be blindsided by unexpected charges mid-term. Regular internal audits during the EA (e.g., quarterly) can also catch any usage drift before it becomes a budget issue at the annual true-up.
Read about our Microsoft EA renewal service.
Do you want to know more about our Microsoft EA renewal service?
